Nasdaq fell 0.6%

Strota Newsroom · Global Markets · session of 2026-09-01 · market close

Nasdaq Composite closed at 26,370.89 on 2026-08-31, fell 0.6% on the session and is +13.5% year-to-date. Here is what the market data shows.

The Nasdaq Composite closed at 26,370.89 on August 31, down 0.64% on the day, though it remained up 0.73% over the past week and 4.97% over the past month. Year to date the index has gained 13.46%.

The close left it 2.67% below its 52-week high of 27,093.9 and 26.82% above its 52-week low of 20,794.64. It held above both its 50-day average of 25,958.39 and its 200-day average of 24,315.54, although over three months it was off 2.23%.

On the August 31 session the S&P 500 fell 0.58% and the Dow dropped 0.72%, matching the Nasdaq's soft tone. Europe's most recent closes, dated August 27, were mixed — the DAX rose 0.31%, the FTSE 100 fell 0.79%, the CAC 40 dropped 1.68% and the Euro Stoxx 50 eased 0.71%. Asia's September 1 closes were also split: the Nikkei fell 0.38% and the KOSPI dropped 1.26%, while the Shanghai Composite rose 1.13%.

The day's headlines leaned cautious. NDTV Profit reported the S&P 500, Dow and Nasdaq slipping into the red as the US and Iran renewed tensions around the Hormuz strait. A separate report from indiagazette.com described Wall Street slipping on Monday with the Nasdaq Composite lower. Older items in the pack pointed to Nvidia-driven tech strength and index membership changes, including a report from Yahoo Finance that Apnimed joined the Nasdaq Composite.

The data shows a modest down session for the Nasdaq inside a still-positive medium-term trend — above its key averages and up double digits for the year. It does not establish a single cause; the available headlines mix geopolitics with company-specific items, none confirmed as the driver.

The numbers

Around the world (same session)

Recent headlines

Sources

Keep digging

How this article was made: Strota assembled the market data above (the index's price history, same-session peer-market moves and public headlines) and an AI model wrote the narrative strictly from that evidence — it is not permitted to add outside facts or numbers. Every figure comes from the underlying market/public data.