Crude is closing in on $100. The post-war number being predicted is $40
Brent crude is approaching $100 a barrel, and the reason is floating off Iran's coast on fire. The latest escalation came on Saturday, when US forces struck three Iranian oil tankers, according to US Central Command. One of the vessels was hit off Kharg Island, near Iran's key oil export hub. For most of the past two years, oil prices have reacted to wars in the Middle East with a spike and a shrug. This weekend's strikes are harder to shrug off, because for the first time in this conflict the ships carrying the oil itself are the targets.
The image that will define this phase came from CENTCOM's own video release. According to NDTV Profit, the US military published footage of the M/T Kylo, one of the three Iranian crude oil tankers targeted on Saturday, sinking in the Gulf of Oman. A burning tanker is a visceral thing, but for oil markets it is also an arithmetic thing. Every shipowner moving cargo through the Gulf now has to price in the chance that the next voyage ends on the seabed, and that cost lands in the freight rate, the insurance premium, and eventually the price at the pump.
The $100 line matters even to people who never think about oil. It is a round number that anchors headlines, budget math and central bank meetings. India feels this more sharply than most large economies, because the country imports the bulk of the crude its refineries run on. When Brent grinds toward $100, the import bill swells, the rupee comes under pressure, and fuel prices become a kitchen-table conversation again. That is the quiet reason a strike in the Gulf of Oman shows up in an Indian household's monthly expenses a few weeks later.
Here is the twist that makes this story stranger than a simple war premium. According to an NDTV Profit headline, Bessent sees crude collapsing to $40 once the Iran war ends, calling the post-war price crash massive. The same week that spot prices probe $100, one of the people shaping US economic policy is on record expecting less than half that number when the shooting stops. Bessent did not offer a timeframe for the war's conclusion, and the NDTV Profit report notes the conflict shows little sign of concluding anytime soon.
Both numbers can be true, because they describe different moments. The $100 on the screen today is the price of danger: tankers being hit, a chokepoint strait under threat, insurance markets repricing voyages by the hour. The $40 is a bet on the aftermath: wars end, risk premiums evaporate, and oil that commanded a scarcity premium during the fighting can flood back into a market that no longer fears for its supply. The gap between those two prices, roughly sixty dollars on the same barrel, is what traders call the war premium, and it is the most violent swing factor in the world economy right now.
There is also a peace channel running through this market, and it moves prices in real time. A Baird Maritime report noted that Putin's peace signals reined in the oil price surge sparked by the US strikes. That is how the market now works: a strike pushes crude up, a headline about talks drags it back down, sometimes within the same trading session. Oil is no longer trading on barrels in storage. It is trading on the next dispatch from the Gulf, and each one gets priced in minutes.
For a household reader, the mechanics are worth understanding even if the trading is not. If the tanker war continues and Brent holds near $100, expect costlier fuel imports, a weaker currency against the dollar, and companies passing higher energy bills into prices over the following months. If a settlement arrives instead, the premium can unwind as fast as it appeared, which is exactly the collapse Bessent's $40 call describes. Nothing about either path is certain, and anyone claiming to know which arrives first is guessing.
What the reporting establishes is narrow and verifiable: US Central Command says its forces struck three Iranian tankers, one off Kharg Island, and released video of the M/T Kylo sinking in the Gulf of Oman; Brent is approaching $100; Bessent expects $40 after the war; and peace signals from Putin have already pulled the price back at least once. What it does not establish is how long the tanker campaign lasts, whether the sinking footage reflects broader damage to Gulf shipping, or when the conflict ends. Those are the questions that will decide whether the next round number oil visits is $100 or $40.
The uncomfortable summary is that the world's most important commodity now has two prices attached to it, a wartime one near $100 and a promised peacetime one at $40, and no one can tell you the date they swap.
Sources and method
- Oil Price Today (September 7): Crude oil approaches $100 as US, Iran strikes hit oil vessels in Hormuz. Experts weigh in (Economic Times)
- Crude Oil To Hit $40? Bessent Predicts Massive Post-Iran War Price Crash (NDTV Business)
- US-Iran Strikes: CENTCOM Releases Video Of Iranian Oil Tanker Sinking In Gulf Of Oman — Watch (NDTV Business)
- Putin peace signals rein in oil price surge sparked by US strikes (Baird Maritime)
More money stories
- Dollar firms as Middle East tensions push oil and yields higher
- Rs 30,919 crore in one month: foreign funds just backed Indian stocks for the second month running
- Crude's first weekly fall in weeks is no reprieve for Surat's weavers
- India's bonds slipped as a flood of new debt met cautious buyers, even while oil gave them a gift
- Bitcoin's rally builds toward $80,000 as ETF demand meets a short squeeze
- Gold touches its highest level since mid-May as buying momentum builds