While Tech Giants Ax 21,000 Jobs, This IPO Made 13 Employees Crorepatis Overnight
The email arrives at 6 a.m. 'Today is your last day.' No warning, no conversation. Across the tech industry, this scene has become numbingly familiar. Oracle recently shed 21,000 roles over twelve months, with executives openly crediting artificial intelligence for the bloodletting. Meta faces lawsuits alleging its algorithms targeted workers on medical leave for termination. Microsoft cut 3,200 Xbox employees as entire studios vanished.
But in a corner of the financial world, a radically different story unfolded.
When SBI Funds Management listed on the stock exchange, thirteen employees discovered that years of quietly accumulated equity had transformed them into crorepatis—each holding vested shares worth more than Rs 1 crore. For Deputy Managing Director Devinder Pal Singh, the payout reached Rs 121 crore. Chief Investment Officer Srinivasan Rama Iyer saw his stake valued at approximately Rs 105 crore. The smallest winner in this cohort still crossed a threshold that redefines financial security in India.
This is the two-speed economy of 2025, operating in plain sight. On one track, AI-driven efficiency mandates erase livelihoods by the thousands. On the other, ownership structures built over decades suddenly crystallize into generational wealth.
The contrast could not be sharper. While Oracle executives told investors that artificial intelligence helped justify eliminating 21,000 positions, SBI Funds' employee stock ownership program was delivering precisely the opposite outcome: job-linked wealth creation at scale. The same week that Meta employees scrambled to use benefits before algorithms potentially selected them for redundancy, Singh and his colleagues were watching their net worth expand by nine figures.
What separates these experiences is not talent or effort. It is capital structure.
Employee stock ownership plans, or ESOPs, function as a long-term bet on collective success. Workers receive options to purchase shares at fixed prices, typically vesting over years of service. If the company thrives and goes public, the gap between that fixed price and market value becomes personal wealth. If the company struggles, the options expire worthless. The risk is total; the reward, potentially transformational.
For SBI Funds' thirteen crorepatis, patience paid out. The firm, managing assets for one of India's largest banking networks, had built value gradually through regulated, fee-based business rather than speculative growth. Its public offering unlocked that stored value for employees who had accepted lower cash compensation in exchange for equity participation.
The tech layoff narrative offers a mirror image. There, stock compensation has historically been generous but volatile, tied to share prices that swing with quarterly earnings and investor sentiment. When those prices falter, or when capital becomes expensive, the same companies that distributed equity lavishly become ruthless about headcount. The wealth effect works in both directions.
The broader pattern is becoming clear. Companies facing pressure to demonstrate AI returns are cutting first and asking questions later. Oracle's chairman Larry Ellison has been explicit: automation enables smaller workforces. Meta's Mark Zuckerberg has framed 2025 as a 'year of efficiency' while pouring billions into artificial intelligence infrastructure. The human cost is measurable—20,000 positions eliminated at Meta and Microsoft alone, according to tracking data, with workers alleging discriminatory algorithmic targeting in court filings.
Against this backdrop, the SBI Funds outcome reads almost nostalgically. No disruption narrative. No efficiency mandate. Just a traditional asset-management business, steadily growing, eventually sharing its public-market premium with the employees who built it.
For ordinary workers navigating this bifurcated landscape, the lesson is structural rather than inspirational. The gap between those who build wealth through employment and those who merely draw salaries is widening, but the mechanism matters enormously. Equity in a stable, cash-generating business with a plausible path to liquidity can outperform even generous salaries in volatile sectors. Conversely, equity in growth-chasing tech firms has proven treacherous—generous during expansion, precarious during contraction.
The thirteen SBI Funds employees are not lottery winners. They are beneficiaries of a compensation design that aligned their interests with long-term institutional health, executed in an industry where that alignment could eventually find a public market. Their counterparts in tech are learning that alignment cuts both ways: when capital costs rise and AI promises efficiency, the same equity structures that enriched early hires become justifications for ruthless reduction.
The crorepati count from SBI Funds' IPO is specific: thirteen. The layoff count from Oracle's AI transition is specific: 21,000. Between these numbers lies the contemporary story of work and wealth—one that depends less on individual merit than on which side of a capital structure you happened to occupy when the market turned.
More money stories
- The $4.3 Trillion Question: Why 4,500 Google Workers Are Begging for Layoff Protection
- Meta Workers Say an Algorithm Decided Their Fate—Now a Judge Says the Layoffs Can Proceed
- The 6 A.M. Email: How Tech's Layoff Machine Became a Reckoning
- The Algorithm Decided You’re Fired: How Tech Giants Are Using AI to Choose Who Loses Their Job
- The 6 a.m. Email: How Tech's AI Spending Spree Became a Human Wrecking Ball
- The Layoff Playbook: How Tech Giants Are Using AI to Decide Who Stays and Who Goes